Google’s Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro Complete Review

It’s odd to feel so revitalized by a new smartphone. A common refrain is that all smartphones are “mature” technology, with each new phone being just marginally different from the previous one. There’s a lot of truth to that – Apple has created 15 generations of iPhones – and the novelty you get from spending hundreds of dollars on an update every couple of years seldom affects your everyday life.

On the other hand, Google’s new Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro are a little more novel than the average phone, even though they don’t fold in half or have particularly unusual looks. They have new cameras, new materials, new hardware, new software, and new ideas about what a smartphone should be capable of.

But a lot of stuff is new for Google and not remarkably different from what you can get right now from many other smartphone manufacturers. The $599 Pixel 6 and $899 Pixel 6 Pro represent a fresh start for Google’s smartphone aspirations, a new beginning for the corporation that has slogged through five generations of Pixel phones without impacting the smartphone industry.

The Pixel 6 and 6 Pro aren’t completely polished devices that perform as well as Google advertises. However, this does not diminish the fact that they are among the greatest phones available, and possibly the best Android phones available right now.

Google Pixel 6

Pros:

• Fast speed 
• Smooth screen
• Long battery life
• Excellent camera
• Excellent value

Advertisment

The drawbacks are as follows: 

• Only available in large sizes 
• Slow fingerprint scanner
• Extremely slippery

Google Pixel 6 Pro

Pros: 

• Quick performance 
• Smooth screen 
• Long battery life 
• Excellent camera
• Reasonable price

The drawbacks:

• Large and unwieldy design
• Slow fingerprint scanner 
• Very slippery 
• Significantly more costly than the Pixel 6
• Fit and finish aren’t as good as on other phones in this price bracket

Advertisment

The design of the Pixel phones is a challenge for Google, which has hitherto adhered to the norms of other big Android phone makers. Instead of unusual textured finishes with exciting splashes of color, they are the standard glass and metal sandwich slabs with aluminum frames and slick backs. There’s less whimsy and character in their details than in previous Pixel phones, which I miss. And, if you look closely, they aren’t nearly as polished as the finest from Apple and Samsung. At this point – it’s easy to notice a rough edge or two along the seams.

The front of both phones is difficult to differentiate from many other large Android phones on the market; they resemble a Samsung Galaxy Note 10 or Note 20. And, while the rear has a distinguishing bar towards the top that houses the cameras, the overall design reminds me of a TCL phone.

The Pixel 6 comes in three two-tone colors: black, red, and green; however, the Pixel 6 Pro is only available in black, white, or gold. The metal sides of the original 6 are hefty and matte black, but the sides of the 6 Pro are slimmer and polished to a sheen. The 6 is unquestionably more entertaining, but the 6 Pro falls short of competing phones in its pricing range in terms of design or fit and finish

The camera bar that covers the back of each phone is the most visible design element. It’s enormous, stands out a lot, and doesn’t exactly mix in with the rest of the phone. On the positive side, unlike other phones’ camera bumps, it doesn’t cause the phone to wobble on a table or desk when you set it down.

However, many of these design criticisms are merely academic because you’ll cover up any rough edges or dull colors with a case on either phone. That’s also an excellent idea because both phones are capital-L Large and have slick glass backs that are pretty slippery. I’ve had them fall off my desk, wireless chargers, sofa arms, tables, my lap, you name it, and one of our trial units fell hard enough to fracture the Gorilla Glass Victus glass panel covering its screen.

Advertisment

The primary issue with the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro’s designs is that they are too large for someone’s tastes. They are challenging to use with one hand, don’t fit comfortably in many jeans pockets, and are quickly dropped. Previously, Google provided both small and large versions of their phones, but it’s significant or more remarkable; the size difference between the two is tiny. These are iPhone Pro Max-sized phones, which is good if you want a giant phone but excludes those of us who don’t like enormous slabs.

On the plus side, both phones offer large, roomy screens. The Pixel 6 has a 6.4-inch OLED panel with a 1080p comprehensive resolution, while the Pixel 6 Pro has a 6.7-inch OLED screen with a 1440p complete resolution. The Pixel 6 screen is flat, but the Pixel 6 Pro features curved sides that taper towards the frame. I like the flat screen of the 6, but the curves of the 6 Pro didn’t create any errant touch difficulties in my testing, which may make a curved screen tough to use.

Both are crisp, brilliant, and colorful, with the 6 Pro being significantly brighter in direct sunshine. Neither has any noticeable issues that plagued previous Pixel phones, such as odd color reproduction or flickering at low light settings.

If you look closely, you’ll see certain flaws, like a minor color shift at oblique angles or a perceptible shadow under the curved sides of the 6 Pro when using a light backdrop, which we don’t see on Apple or Samsung’s top phones at this moment. If there’s one place where the lower price tag of these phones shines through, it’s in the screens. They’re friendly but not up to the standard set by other flagship competitors.

The displays are good, but not the best we’ve seen

Advertisment

They also feature quick refresh rates — 90Hz on the Pixel 6 and up to 120Hz on the 6 Pro — making scrolling and interactions exceedingly fluid. Fast refresh displays have become standard on high-end phones, and it’s encouraging to see Google follow suit. I didn’t detect a difference between the 90Hz and 120Hz unless I examined the side of the phone by the side—both are smooth in usage.

The fingerprint scanner behind the screen is less than ideal. It’s at a convenient location — about a fourth of the way up from the bottom — but it’s far slower than other fingerprint scanners, even those on the rear of last Pixel phones. Because it is optical, the screen illuminates when you scan a finger, which may be very distracting in dark surroundings. The scanner also misinterpreted my finger from time to time, necessitating repeated attempts to unlock the phone.

This problem is exacerbated by the lack of face unlocking on the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro – the fingerprint reader is the sole biometric authentication option, which isn’t ideal.

The CPU within the Pixel 6 pair, Google’s new Tensor chip, is one of the most crucial aspects of the device. It is Google’s first proprietary CPU, following in Apple’s footsteps and leaving off-the-shelf processors like Qualcomm or MediaTek in the dust

The Tensor engine, in addition to running the phone, provides several AI-powered adjustments to improve photography, speech recognition, and gaming functions.

Google claims that the new CPU outperforms the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 in terms of performance, and in my experience, this is accurate. Apps open quickly, switching between them is fluid, and the interface lacks stutters and hang-ups. Twitter was the only app that stalled both phones, although it was odd. The Tensor chip will not outperform Apple’s newest CPUs, but it is well ahead of the processor used in the Pixel 5 last year and on par with other premium Android phones.

The Pixel 6 features 8GB of RAM, and the Pixel 6 Pro has 12GB. In practice, the 6’s lower RAM did not cause problems – streaming applications did not close forcefully in the background like they did on last Pixel phones.

There was no discernible difference in battery life between the two phones. Both can easily go through a full day of use with plenty of juice remaining in the tank – even with regular camera use and the always-on display option, I went to bed with 35-40 percent battery left most evenings. Light users may extend this to two days without any difficulty. One of the main reasons for this endurance is that the batteries are large – large phones come with large hail and long battery life.

Advertisment

Both versions allow wireless charging and rapid cable charging, although none comes with a charger. Google offers a $25 30-watt brick separately and plans to release a $79 fast wireless charger shortly, but I haven’t had the opportunity to test it yet.

Even if you use a robust enough charger, neither phone charges rapidly. Google actively slows charging after it reaches 80 percent to maintain the battery cells’ longevity. Since these batteries are so enormous, getting to a full charge might take a long time. Fortunately, because of the long battery life, you’ll probably need to charge when you’re sleeping.

Another area where the Pixels shine is in haptic feedback. Rotten, buzzy haptics can spoil a phone experience for me, but the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro offer subtle, clicky reactions that deliver precisely the appropriate amount of input.

The Pixel 6 and 6 Pro have genuine, dual stereo speakers that pump out a sufficient level of loudness and sound clean for both streaming music or video and taking speakerphone or video conversations. Goodbye, Google’s vibrating screen pseudo-speaker from the Pixel 5 last year.

Google is touting a 5G connection for the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, but the facts aren’t nearly as plain. The Pixel 6 unlocked and T-Mobile variants are limited to sub-6 5G, but the Verizon and AT&T models are more costly and feature the faster but limited millimeter wave (mmWave) 5G.

None of this applies to the Pixel 6 Pro, which will support both sub-6 and mmWave 5G regardless of how you purchase it. AT&T’s premium over unlocked, T-Mobile, or Verizon models only gets you the luxury of being an AT&T subscriber.

Google has finally improved the camera hardware in the Pixel series for the first time since 2017, and it’s gone big – literally. The new main camera sensor is substantially larger than the one used in the Pixel 5 and previous models. The Pixel 6 Pro is the first to have ultrawide, wide, and telephoto cameras. The camera systems in the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro are likewise entirely new, with new sensors, lenses, and capabilities.

Advertisment

Both phones feature the same main wide camera and ultrawide camera. The primary camera has a 50-megapixel sensor that is hard-coded to output 12.5-megapixel photos behind an optically stabilized f/1.85 lens. That means you won’t be able to capture the full 50-megapixel resolution, and the resulting photographs won’t be much crisper or more detailed than comparable 12-megapixel cameras, including the Pixel 5’s.

The pixel 6 pro camera is most pleasant to use

Nonetheless, the photographs are impressive in both normal and low light and are on par with Apple’s finest. I won’t say there’s a clear victor here; some photographs from the Pixel 6 seem better, some shots from the iPhone 13 Pro look better, and which you prefer truly boils down to your personal preferences, as we’ve been saying about smartphone cameras for a few years now.

The Pixel 6 photos feature the characteristic Pixel look: strong contrast, mild overexposure, great sharpness, and a colder white balance. White balance can be readily adjusted using on-screen sliders in the camera app. However, sharpness takes a little more post-processing work. Google’s fake portrait mode is also virtually intact – it aggressively blurs the backdrop to the point that it nearly seems like the person is a cardboard cutout set in a diagram.

Advertisment

Overall, the improvements in image quality from the primary camera are not as great as you might anticipate from new, much better technology. In excellent lighting, it’s often difficult to see the difference between it and earlier Pixel phones.

The ultra-wide camera on the Pixel 6 is its weakest link; photographs are grainy, not as wide as the others, and there are noticeable color and processing discrepancies between it and the primary camera. It also lacks the macro focusing capabilities seen on the iPhone 13 Pro’s ultrawide camera.

The Pixel 6 Pro’s telephoto camera, on the other hand, is superb. The 4x zoom is notably longer than the 3x telephoto on the iPhone 13 Pro, but it’s far more usable daily than the 10x zoom on Samsung’s Galaxy S21 Ultra. That’s the first telephoto lens on a phone that I’ve genuinely enjoyed using, and it could be reason enough to choose the 6 Pro over the normal 6.

Furthermore, the telephoto delivers clear, detailed shots with excellent subject separation, necessitating significantly less usage of software-based portrait settings. It’s a lot of fun to photograph with and transform what you can do with your phone.

Google claims to have improved the Pixel 6’s video capturing capabilities, but it still lags behind the iPhone, which remains the benchmark. You can shoot 4K 60fps for as long as you want without the phone overheating. However, there’s still considerable artifacting and wonkiness with image stabilization, and video image processing is very different from how the Pixel handles still photographs. Highly saturated hues, like reds and oranges, are amplified to the utmost in the video, virtually identical to how Samsung used to handle colors years ago.

The cameras on the front of the phones differ: the Pixel 6 has an 8-megapixel camera with an 84-degree field of vision, while the Pixel 6 Pro has an 11-megapixel camera with a 94-degree field of view. Not only can you fit more people into the 6 Pro’s frame, but the image quality is also considerably improved.

The Pixel’s Tensor processor enables unique software tricks in the camera and pictures apps. The new Magic Eraser tool allows you to eliminate undesired individuals or items from a taken shot with one swipe, or you may highlight things to delete. It’s extremely impressive, but it’s also hit or miss – it won’t be able to replace professional Photoshop editors anytime soon. You can also do comparable things with third-party applications, so purchasing a Pixel isn’t required.

What piqued my interest the most were the new motion capture settings, which allow you to replicate a motion panorama or slow shutter speed with a single click of the shutter button. You may freeze a moving item, such as an automobile, in front of a blurred backdrop, or you can record traffic light streaks without using a tripod.

With a typical camera, these photographs require years of training and a lot of equipment to achieve, but the Pixel 6 makes it as simple as shooting a selfie.

The Pixel 6 and 6 Pro, as one would expect from a new Pixel, run the most recent version of Google’s Android, the fully rebuilt Android 12.

Unsurprisingly, there are several Pixel-specific software features, including those enhanced by Google’s new Tensor processor. The Pixel 6 features improved voice dictation transcription since it can now perform it all locally, and it can translate foreign languages in communications and media faster than before.

But the most interesting software features, in my opinion, are available in the phone app. The Pixel 6 can aid you with automated phone tree systems and inform you how long you might have to wait when you contact the firm, in addition to the spam routing technologies that Google has been utilizing for some years. He may even be waiting for you and will notify you when someone answers the phone

The automated phone tree function will listen in on the call, transcribe the alternatives offered, and then provide you with large tappable buttons to make your selection. It’s a lot more convenient than attempting to hear every word the system says to miss something essential and having to restart it.

But, in testing, it’s evident that this still needs development – it can’t distinguish languages other than English (for example, when you’re told to “push two for Spanish”). It frequently misses phrases and context that prohibit it from displaying the correct buttons on the screen. Still, it’s an interesting notion, and I hope Google continues to tweak and improve on it.

Other changes include the ability to display boarding passes and other relevant information directly on the lock screen, as well as support for select spoken requests to the Assistant without first saying “Hey Google.” When an alarm goes off, it’s very simple to merely whisper “snooze” and have the phone obey.

The amount of value packed in adds to their allure. The Pixel 6, in particular, is a lot of phones for $600 – there isn’t much in the shops that can compete with it at that price. In the areas where the Pixel is available, Google provides a better experience than almost any other Android phone vendor, and frequently at a lesser price. It’s even undercutting OnePlus, which built its whole brand on providing superior phones at reduced rates.

Is this to imply that a large number of consumers will purchase the Pixel 6 or 6 Pro, despite Google’s protracted battle to win market share? I don’t care because people who buy it will get a terrific phone at a great price. It’s difficult to disagree with that

One of the most pressing concerns surrounding the Pixel 6 unveiling has been, “Did Google do it?” Is it genuinely capable of producing a respectable, flagship-level smartphone free of show-stopping faults or major stumbling blocks?

And the answer is yes: the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro are fantastic smartphones. They may not be the top in every category, but they perform admirably overall, with brilliant screens, incredible cameras, and consistently extended battery life. The only true drawback is the size; if you don’t like big phones, they aren’t for you.